Ten Reasons the Official Story of 9-11 Can’t Be Trusted

Each of these ten is sufficient on its’ own to disprove the official story of what really occurred on September 11th, 2001. To date, none of these questions has been answered sensibly:

1. Why did our military fail to act?  How was it possible the Pentagon was attacked 1 hour and 20 minutes after the attacks began? Why was there no response from Andrews Air Force Base, just 10 miles away and home to Air National Guard units charged with defending the skies above the capital? How did Hani Hanjour, a man who failed as a Cessna pilot on his first flight in a Boeing, execute a difficult aerobatic maneuver to strike the Pentagon? Why did the attack strike the only side which was empty, thus minimizing casualties?

2. What about the war games? The multiple military war games planned long in advance and held on the morning of September 11th included scenarios of a domestic air crisis, a plane crashing into a government building, and a large-scale emergency in New York. If this was (as we have been told) only a series of coincidences, why did the official investigations avoid the issue? There is evidence that the war games created confusion as to whether the unfolding events were “real world or exercise.” Did the war games serve as the cover for the attacks?

3. Insider trading? Unknown speculators allegedly used foreknowledge of the Sept. 11th events to profiteer on many markets internationally – including but not limited to “put options” placed to short-sell the two airlines, WTC tenants, and WTC insurance companies in Chicago and London. President Bush promised the nation that those who profited from the attacks would be tracked down and face justice. They never were. The official story, that the securities were purchased “anonymously” is ridiculous. Just try to buy a half million dollars in stocks or securities some time, without identifying yourself, and see if it works!

4. The Black Boxes? Airplane black boxes were definitely found at Ground Zero, according to two first responders and an unnamed NTSB official, but they were “disappeared” and their existence is denied in The 9/11 Commission Report. What are they trying to hide?

5. Destroying the evidence? The rapid and illegal removal and scrapping of the WTC ruins at Ground Zero eliminated almost all of the structural steel indispensable to any investigation of the collapse mechanics. After the steel was gone, the official Twin Towers collapse investigation was left with almost no forensic evidence, and thus could only provide dubious computer models of ultimately unproven hypotheses. It failed to even test debris for the possibility of explosives.

6. What were Bush & Cheney hiding? Bush and Cheney pressured Congress into delaying the 9/11 investigation for months. They fought against the creation of an independent investigation for more than a year. Bush initially refused to testify, and finally agreed to appear informally, but only with Vice President Dick Cheney at his side, and not under oath.

7. The alleged masterminds? Khalid Sheikh Mohamed (KSM) and Ramzi Binalshibh, are reported to have been captured in 2002 and 2003, although one Pakistani newspaper said KSM was killed in an attempted capture. They have allegedly been held prisoner at undisclosed locations and their supposed testimonies, as provided in transcript form by the government, form much of the basis for The 9/11 Commission Report (although the Commission’s request to see them in person was denied). After holding them for years, why doesn’t the government produce these men and put them on trial for what they have allegedly admitted to?

8. Phony Phone Calls? The descriptions of the perpetrators, right down to the box cutters, comes from phone calls allegedly made from the planes to people on the ground. Some of these calls lasted as long as 13 minutes. At first, the official story was that numerous cell phone calls were made from the doomed planes. When researchers proved that such calls could not have been made from such heights, the official story was changed to say that passengers had used air-phones aboard the planes to make calls.  Then, American Airlines and United said that the 757 jetliners used in the attacks were not equipped with such phones. The official story has now changed again to only two calls, both on cell phones, both under 5,000 feet, and both lasting only a few seconds. One of the supposed recipients of a 9-11 call was President Bush’s lawyer, Solicitor General Ted Olson. Olson said his wife (CNN reporter Barbara Olson – who died in the attacks) had called him collect, something which could not have been done from a cell or sky-phone. He described two different conversations with her, in which she tells him, “Ted, my plane has been hijacked…“ and goes into great detail about the Arabic-looking hijackers. Olson gave a detailed statement that is apparently provably false. Why would he do such a thing? Why has no one produced a phone bill proving even one of these famous calls actually occurred?

9. Why did THAT building fall down? There were actually three buildings which collapsed on 9-11 at Ground Zero.
We all watched, horrified, as WTC #1 and #2 fell to Earth. But there was another large office building, WTC #7, which also collapsed. This 47-story building was never struck by a plane, although a small fire was reported extinguished on an upper floor, perhaps ignited by debris.  About twenty minutes before WTC #7 collapsed, the BBC Network went live to a reporter in New York who described WTC #7 collapsing, while it still stood in the background. What was behind this amazing feat of clairvoyance?

 

10. The War Was Already Planned? On the morning of 9-11, 25,000 British troops and the largest British Armada since the Falkland Islands War, part of Operation ‘Essential Harvest,’ were pre-positioned in Oman, the closest point on the Arabian Peninsula to Pakistan. At the same time two U.S. carrier battle groups had arrived on station in the Gulf of Arabia just off the Pakistani coast.  Any Navy vet will tell you that TWO carrier groups in the Indian Ocean is unheard of. It had never happened before.  At the same time, some 17,000 U.S. troops joined more than 23,000 NATO troops in Egypt for Operation ‘Bright Star.’ All of these forces were in place before the first plane hit the World Trade Center, then they all were used to invade Afghanistan and Iraq.  How could they have known ahead of time?

There is no innocent explanation for any of the ten issues described above.  There is no plausible scenario to explain even one of them, let alone all ten.  There are many other questions, for example, why are there no clear pictures of the Pentagon attack? The Pentagon was at the time equipped with hundreds of the most sophisticated cameras in the world.  And how did the buildings collapse exactly like controlled demolitions?  And how did the alleged hijackers get aboard the planes, when only two of them allegedly bought tickets? And why are half of the alleged hijackers still alive? And why were Israeli Mossad agents seen celebrating on a rooftop as they filmed and photographed the events from a New Jersey rooftop across the harbor from Manhattan? And why were the Bin Laden family allowed to leave the US without being questioned? And how did structural steel girders with asbestos coatings dissolve in flames caused by jet fuel, which burns at far too low of a temperature to melt steel?  Again, no good answers to any of these questions.

In view all of this evidence, the only reasonable conclusion is that our government lied to us about the most significant and eventful day in the history of this nation. It really was an “inside job” perpetrated by an entity capable of such an operation.  Only two such entities exist:  Mossad and the CIA.  Neither could have done it without the other being complicit.
Why did they lie, and what were the ultimate goals?  Those are questions that can only come out if we can indict, arrest, and try the criminals responsible.

This entry was posted in All posts, History. Bookmark the permalink.